Medical Marijuana : The Debate Rages On

Medical marijuana is also known as pot, sod and filter but its formal name is actually cannabis. It comes from the leaves and flowers of the plant Cannabis sativa. It is considered an Brooklyn Medical Marijuana Delivery Service illegal substance the united states and many countries and control of medical marijuana is a crime punishable for legal reasons. The FDA classifies medical marijuana as Schedule I, substances which have got a high potential for abuse and have no proven medical use. Over the years several studies claim that some substances found in medical marijuana have medicinal use, especially in port diseases such as cancer and AIDS. This started a fierce debate over the pros and cons of the use of medical medical marijuana. To be in this debate, the Institute of Medicine published the famous 1999 IOM report entitled Medical marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base. The report was comprehensive but did not give a clear cut yes or no answer. Another camps of the medical medical marijuana issue often cite area of the report in their advocacy arguments. However, although the report clarified many things, it never settled the controversy permanently.

Let’s look at the issues that support why medical medical marijuana should be legalized.

(1) Medical marijuana is a naturally occurring herb and has been used from South america to Asia as an herbal medicine for millennia. In this day and age when the all natural and organic are important health buzzwords, a naturally occurring herb like medical marijuana might be more appealing to and safer for consumers than man-made drugs.

(2) Medical marijuana has strong therapeutic potential. Several studies, as described in the IOM report, have observed that cannabis can be used as analgesic, e. gary. to treat pain. A few studies showed that THC, a medical marijuana component is beneficial in treating chronic pain experienced by cancer patients. However, studies on extreme pain such as those experienced during surgery and tension have inconclusive reports. A few studies, also described in the IOM report, have demonstrated that some medical marijuana components have antiemetic properties and are, therefore, effective against nausea and nausea, which are common side effects of cancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Some researchers are convinced that cannabis has some therapeutic potential against neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Specific compounds taken out from medical marijuana have strong therapeutic potential. Cannobidiol (CBD), a major component of medical marijuana, has been shown to have antipsychotic, anticancer and antioxidant properties. Other cannabinoids have been shown to prevent high intraocular pressure (IOP), a major risk factor for glaucoma. Drugs that incorporate substances present in medical marijuana but have been synthetically stated in the clinical have been approved by the US FDA. One example is Marinol, an antiemetic agent indicated for nausea and nausea associated with cancer chemotherapy. Its active ingredient is dronabinol, a man-made delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

(3) One of the major proponents of medical medical marijuana is the Medical marijuana Policy Project (MPP), a US-based organization. Many medical professional societies and organizations have expressed their support. As an example, The American College of Health professionals, recommended a re-evaluation of the Schedule I classification of medical marijuana in their ’08 position paper. ACP also states its strong support for research into the therapeutic role of medical marijuana as well as exemption from federal criminal prosecution; city liability; or professional sanctioning for health professionals who propose or dispense medical medical marijuana as per state law. Similarly, protection from criminal or city penalties for patients who use medical medical marijuana as permitted under state laws.

(4) Medical medical marijuana is legally used in many developed countries The argument of if they can do it, why not us? is another strong point. Some countries, including Europe, Belgium, Austria, the netherlands, great britain, The world, Israel, and Finland have legalized the therapeutic use of medical marijuana under strict prescription control. Some states the united states are also allowing exemptions.

Now here are the arguments against medical medical marijuana.

(1) Lack of data on safety and efficacy. Drug regulation is based on safety first. The safety of medical marijuana and its components still has to first be established. Efficacy only comes second. Even if medical marijuana has some beneficial health effects, the benefits should outweigh the risks for it to be considered for medical use. Unless medical marijuana is estimated to be better (safer and more effective) than drugs currently in the market, its approval for medical use may be a long shot. According to the account of Robert J. Meyer of the Department of Health and Human Services having access to a drug or medical treatment, without understanding to use it or even if it is effective, does not benefit anyone. Simply having access, without having safety, efficacy, and adequate use information does not help patients.

(2) Unknown chemical components. Medical medical marijuana can only be easy to access and affordable in herbal form. Like other herbs, medical marijuana falls under the sounding botanical products. Unpurified botanical products, however, face many problems including lot-to-lot consistency, dosage determination, sexual strength, shelf-life, and toxicity. According to the IOM report if there is any future of medical marijuana as a medicine, it lies in its remoted components, the cannabinoids and their man-made derivatives. To totally characterize the different components of medical marijuana would cost so much time and money that the costs of the medications that will leave it would be beyond their budget. Currently, no pharmaceutic company seems interested in investing money to segregate more therapeutic components from medical marijuana beyond what is already in the market.

(3) Potential for abuse. Medical marijuana or cannabis is obsessive. It may not be as obsessive as hard drugs such as cocaine; but it really cannot be rejected that there is a potential for substance abuse associated with medical marijuana. It has been demonstrated by a few studies as described in the IOM report.

(4) Lack of a safe delivery system. The most common form of delivery of medical marijuana is through smoking. Considering the current trends in anti-smoking legislations, this form of delivery will never be approved by health authorities. Reliable and safe delivery systems in the form of vaporizers, nebulizers, or inhalers are still at the testing stage.

(5) Indicator relief, not cure. Even if medical marijuana has therapeutic effects, it is only addressing the symptoms of certain diseases. It does not treat or cure these illnesses. Given that it is effective against these symptoms, there are already medications available which work just as well or even better, without the side effects and risk of abuse associated with medical marijuana

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.